Philosophical-Anthropological Approach to Historic-Cultural Research :: Philosophy Anthropology Essays

philosophical-Anthropological speak to to Historic- ethnic ResearchABSTRACT This approach holds that the problem of humanity determines the history of culture. On the basis of possibleness developed by scoop shovel Scheler, I try to work out the main characteristics of cultural process, the typology of culture, and the periodization of culture. The humanities in Russia are in the midst of a methodological crisis now, and I anticipate that this approach will help us obtain a fuller understanding of culture. Theres not a secret that Russian Humanities are in a methodological crisis now. Our scientists look for juvenile Methods and Approaches using the Conceptions of Western Science. Among them American Anthropology is the most popular in the last long time throughout the World. Philosophers are arouse in Ecological Anthropology which learns the adaptation of people to environment especially (see Sahlin M. Evolution specific and general// Theory in Anthropology. adroitness R., P aplan D. (eds). Chicago.1968 Hatch E. The growth of economics, subsistence and bionomical studies in American Anthropology// Journal of Anthropological Reseach. Vol.29.1973). Many American scientists prefer the neoevolution Method with the analyses of Race, Nation and others ethnic or neighborly groups (see, for example Lazlo E. Evolution The Grans Syntethesis. Boston.1987). Among new approaches we can see some connected with Psychology. (See Bock Ph.K. Rethinking Psychological Anthropology. N.Y. 1988 Berry J., Poortinga Y., Legall M., Dasen P. Cross-Cultural Psychology Research and Applications. Cambridge, 1992 Cole M. Cultural Psychology. Cambridge, 1996 Coult A.D. Psychodelic Anthropology. Philadelphia, 1997 and others). The authors write about appellation of Person, socialization and culturalization of children, about ethological method, which helps us to understand the interaction between Person and Society. Psychological Anthropology takes the first place in work out the th eme civilisation and Personality now, but it resolves this theme in the direction of Man adaptation to the modern Society. There is, however, the Conception, in which the development of finis seems to be depended on the ascendant of the Problem of Person-new Philosophical Anthropology. My special interest is connected, first of all, with this Conception as a Theory of Culture. New Philosophic Anthropology is well developed in Western Science, but practically unknown in Russia. Our philosophers only begin to study the Conception of its founder-Max Scheler (see Max Scheler. Izbranniye proizvedeniya. M., 1994). Max Scheler created the world(a) Theory of the historical work out as a penetration of Man into his own substance, as a permanent search for selfness, independent being into itself.Philosophical-Anthropological Approach to Historic-Cultural Research Philosophy Anthropology EssaysPhilosophical-Anthropological Approach to Historic-Cultural ResearchABSTRACT This approach hol ds that the problem of humanity determines the history of culture. On the basis of theory developed by Max Scheler, I try to work out the main characteristics of cultural process, the typology of culture, and the periodization of culture. The humanities in Russia are in the midst of a methodological crisis now, and I hope that this approach will help us obtain a fuller understanding of culture. Theres not a secret that Russian Humanities are in a methodological crisis now. Our scientists look for new Methods and Approaches using the Conceptions of Western Science. Among them American Anthropology is the most popular in the last years throughout the World. Philosophers are interested in Ecological Anthropology which learns the adaptation of people to environment especially (see Sahlin M. Evolution specific and general// Theory in Anthropology. Manners R., Paplan D. (eds). Chicago.1968 Hatch E. The growth of economics, subsistence and ecological studies in American Anthropology// Jour nal of Anthropological Reseach. Vol.29.1973). Many American scientists prefer the neoevolution Method with the analyses of Race, Nation and others ethnic or social groups (see, for example Lazlo E. Evolution The Grans Syntethesis. Boston.1987). Among new approaches we can see some connected with Psychology. (See Bock Ph.K. Rethinking Psychological Anthropology. N.Y. 1988 Berry J., Poortinga Y., Legall M., Dasen P. Cross-Cultural Psychology Research and Applications. Cambridge, 1992 Cole M. Cultural Psychology. Cambridge, 1996 Coult A.D. Psychodelic Anthropology. Philadelphia, 1997 and others). The authors write about identification of Person, socialization and culturalization of children, about ethological method, which helps us to understand the interaction between Person and Society. Psychological Anthropology takes the first place in working out the theme Culture and Personality now, but it resolves this theme in the direction of Man adaptation to the modern Society. There is, ho wever, the Conception, in which the development of Culture seems to be depended on the solution of the Problem of Person-new Philosophical Anthropology. My special interest is connected, first of all, with this Conception as a Theory of Culture. New Philosophic Anthropology is well developed in Western Science, but practically unknown in Russia. Our philosophers only begin to study the Conception of its founder-Max Scheler (see Max Scheler. Izbranniye proizvedeniya. M., 1994). Max Scheler created the global Theory of the historical Process as a penetration of Man into his own substance, as a permanent search for selfness, independent being into itself.